Fixed-fee sprints that deliver a plan, team shape and ship date — not a sixty-slide deck.
See all consulting →Each one has its own regulators, data standards and operational context. Our teams have shipped in every single one.
See all industries →Healthcare carrier, USA — production in 18 weeks, .2M annual savings, 99.98% uptime.
Read case study →Where our benches are deepest. These pages describe what we build, integrate and extend in each space — named platforms and real standards rather than categories.
Start here
A short note goes to an engineer who could lead the work — not a sales queue. We reply within one business day, or email info@gnapitechnologies.com.
Full list
Alphabetical. Each page names the platforms and standards we actually work in.
How we choose technology
Technology selection is an architecture decision with a cost attached, and we record it as one. Every choice gets a decision record in your repository with the alternatives and the reasoning.
Partners
We extend and integrate these rather than reselling licences for them.
Questions
Almost always yes. Adding a platform your team cannot maintain is a cost you carry long after we leave. We argue otherwise only when the existing choice is the actual cause of the problem.
No. We are an engineering firm, so we have no reseller commission steering a recommendation. When a packaged product genuinely fits better than a build, we say so.
Yes, with review discipline. Generated code passes the same review, test and security gates as anything else, and we do not let it into a codebase nobody on the team understands.
Tell us what you are building or what is breaking. The first conversation is with an engineer who would be accountable for the work.
