Fixed-fee sprints that deliver a plan, team shape and ship date — not a sixty-slide deck.
See all consulting →Each one has its own regulators, data standards and operational context. Our teams have shipped in every single one.
See all industries →Healthcare carrier, USA — production in 18 weeks, .2M annual savings, 99.98% uptime.
Read case study →Home/Company/Engagement Models
CompanyThe three models differ in one thing that matters: where decisions get made. Quality bar, seniority and documentation standard are the same whichever you choose.
Start here
A short note goes to an engineer who could lead the work — not a sales queue. We reply within one business day, or email info@gnapitechnologies.com.
Compare
Most long-running clients start in one and move to another as the work changes shape.
| On-Demand Developers | Dedicated Team | Managed Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who owns the roadmap | You, entirely | Shared — you set priorities, we set sequence | GNAPI, against agreed acceptance criteria |
| Who manages the engineers | Your engineering manager | GNAPI delivery lead | GNAPI delivery lead |
| Best when | You are short specific skills | A roadmap running 6–36 months | A defined scope with a date and a service level |
| Commercial shape | Per-person monthly rate | Monthly team rate | Fixed or capped against scope |
| Ramp time | 2–4 weeks per person | 3–6 weeks to full velocity | 4–8 weeks including discovery |
| Your oversight cost | High — daily management | Low — weekly steering | Lowest — milestone review |
Getting started
Sixty to ninety minutes. We map the problem, the constraints and the decision makers, and say plainly whether we are the right firm.
Two to six weeks, paid, producing a written plan: architecture direction, risk register, team shape and a costed sequence. Yours to keep regardless of what you do next.
We name the engineers, you meet them, and cadence, environments, access and definition of done are agreed before anyone bills at full rate.
The first two weeks attack the riskiest unknown — an integration, a data volume, a performance ceiling — rather than the easiest feature.
Two-week increments, an environment you can log into, and a monthly written review of velocity, risk and spend against plan.
Commercial
Ambiguity here causes more failed engagements than technology ever does, so we are explicit.
Questions
Yes, and many clients do — typically starting with on-demand developers to get moving, then converting to a dedicated team once the roadmap firms up. Thirty days’ notice and a short re-planning session.
Raise it at the weekly steering and we change the people. That is part of what you are buying; we do not defend a poor fit.
You do, from the first commit, including documentation and architecture decision records. Our own reusable internal tooling stays ours and is licensed to you at no cost for the life of the product.
For maintenance, SLA support and NOC engagements, yes — a monthly retainer against agreed coverage and response targets. For build work, time and materials with a cap is usually better value than a retainer.
Tell us what you are building or what is breaking. The first conversation is with an engineer who would be accountable for the work.
