Fixed-fee sprints that deliver a plan, team shape and ship date — not a sixty-slide deck.
See all consulting →Each one has its own regulators, data standards and operational context. Our teams have shipped in every single one.
See all industries →Healthcare carrier, USA — production in 18 weeks, .2M annual savings, 99.98% uptime.
Read case study →When you have the roadmap and the management capacity but not the four people — or not the one person who has done this in your industry before. You interview them, you manage them, and they work in your process.
Start here
A short note goes to an engineer who could lead the work — not a sales queue. We reply within one business day, or email info@gnapitechnologies.com.
Roles
Named individuals with sector history, not a pool of interchangeable capacity.
TypeScript and React with Java, .NET, Python or Node behind it. People who own a vertical slice from schema to screen rather than a single layer.
Salesforce, Dynamics 365, SAP, NetSuite, ServiceNow, Esri, Smallworld and IQGeo engineers who have configured and extended these in production.
Pipelines, CDC, reconciliation and migration at volume — Airflow, dbt, Kafka, Debezium and FME, with the reconciliation discipline that makes a migration defensible.
Kubernetes, Terraform, CI/CD and observability for teams whose delivery is bottlenecked on environments rather than on code.
Applied machine learning and agentic systems put into workflows that already run, with the evaluation discipline to prove they help.
Test strategy and automation for systems where a regression has real consequences rather than a cosmetic one.
How it works
What is blocked, what the person needs to have done before, and who they would report to. We shortlist against that rather than against a keyword list.
Named candidates with their sector history attached. No unnamed resources, and nobody is substituted after you choose.
If it is not working, we replace at our cost and you pay nothing for the time.
Your board, your standup, your definition of done, your code review. A GNAPI engagement manager handles anything contractual so you do not have to.
An augmented engineer can pull in a GNAPI specialist for a hard problem at no extra cost for short consultations.
Is this the right model?
| Your situation | Better model | Why |
|---|---|---|
| You have a strong engineering manager and a clear backlog | On-demand developers | You already own the parts a delivery team would bring |
| You need one rare skill for a defined technical problem | On-demand developers | A whole team is overhead you do not need |
| Nobody internally has time to manage day to day | Dedicated team | Augmentation fails without real management capacity on your side |
| The scope has a date and a service level attached | Managed outcome | Accountability needs to sit with one organisation |
| You are inheriting a system nobody understands | Assessment first | Adding people to an unmapped system multiplies the risk |
Terms
Straightforward, because ambiguity here causes more failed engagements than technology ever does.
Questions
Two to four weeks for most skills, longer for genuinely scarce specialisms. We give you the real date rather than the hopeful one, and we will tell you when we do not have the person.
Yes, and it is the most common progression. The people stay, a GNAPI delivery lead is added, and the day-to-day management burden moves off your side.
Thirty days after the minimum term. We would rather you could leave easily than stay because the exit is painful.
Describe the gap and we will come back with named candidates and their sector history.
